A Q&A with Przemysław Zańko, winner of the First Prize in the Open Category
What is your background in science?
I’ve always been interested in science, even if it quickly turned out that I’m not that good at it. As a child I devoured any science book I could get my hands on. Then I discovered Stanisław Lem’s science fiction works and I fell in love with them. As for the quantum physics, as soon as I learned about it I became fascinated with its weirdness and its thought-provoking philosophical implications. It never ceases to amaze me that our reality is so strange and wonderful. And there are so many great stories that quantum physics can inspire.
How did you develop the idea for this story?
The vaguest outline of this idea has been living in my head for a few years, waiting for its time. Originally I wanted to tell a story about a general who one day thinks about destroying all the parallel universes – and then realizes that if he doesn’t, his alter egos will. At the very end, the destruction would’ve been stopped by a group of his alter egos. But this version of the story never really worked for me, it was all sci-fi ideas and no human emotions. It wasn’t until the 2017 Quantum Shorts contest that I finally found a way to make it work. The answer was simple: find a reason why someone would want to destroy the Multiverse.
Additionally, I like to think of this story as a possible sequel to my 2015 Quantum Shorts entry, “Time Management”. Both include parallel worlds and a character named Beckett…
If you could move to another universe, would you? What would you look for?
If I could come back home – yes, I would! I would probably mostly look for parallel versions of my favourite artworks, books and TV shows – just to see how much different they would be. Maybe some of the TV shows that got cancelled prematurely in our world got a second chance in a parallel one? I’d love to watch those.
Do you believe in the multiverse, and why?
I don’t, actually. I think it’s just a handy metaphor that allows us to better understand quantum physics. The Copenhagen interpretation always seemed more believable to me. But what do I know!
What can you tell us about how you wrote the story?
The story took me a couple of days to write. I was unsure at first whether to even participate in the competition as I was quite busy at the time – luckily my girlfriend persuaded me to try! I always write on my laptop in Microsoft Word so I just sat down at my desk at home, drank some black tea and started typing. I found the voice for my main character pretty early on but then it took me a few tries to find the best way to express all of his conflicted emotions. At first I just wrote the story without counting the words and then I edited it down. I had to delete some funny lines about Oppenheimer but overall I didn’t have to cut much – the story was already pretty concise. Then I sent it to some friends, asking them to check my English!
What other projects do you have on the go, or coming up?
In December I finished a novella in Polish about a dying WWII soldier who makes a deal with the devil and then tries desperately to wriggle out of it. It took me a very long time to write but I’m quite proud of it – and it’s getting published this year! In January I started writing a short horror story about a small town frozen in time that I’m very excited about. It will probably take me a few months to finish. After that? Who knows…
Can you name one or two science-inspired books you’ve read in the past year that you would recommend to others? What did you like about them?
I don’t think I’ve read any in the past year but I can recommend two books I’ve read in the past. The first is Michio Kaku’s “Hyperspace” – it’s a fascinating exploration of several scientific concepts such as parallel worlds and spacetime. You also don’t need to know a lot about science to give it a try and it’s fun to read. I enjoyed it immensely. The second book is much harder, but also much more rewarding – “Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid” by Douglas Hofstadter. It taught me a lot about mathematics, music and logic – and it was beautifully written. I probably only understood half of it but it was a great half.
What appealed to you about the Quantum Shorts flash fiction competition?
I’ve never really tried writing in English before so I saw the competition as a fun challenge. I’ve always enjoyed finding creative ways to overcome limitations so the strict word count gave my brain a good puzzle to solve. It also ensured that I won’t try to turn this story into an epic seven-book saga, in which case I would probably never finish it… The possibility of winning a prize was also pretty motivating!
Some people believe this changes everything in the quantum world, even bringing things into existence.
In quantum experiments, these are the names traditionally given to the people transmitting and receiving information. In quantum cryptography, an eavesdropper called Eve tries to intercept the information.
This is the basic building block of matter that creates the world of chemical elements – although it is made up of more fundamental particles.
In 1964, John Bell came up with a way of testing whether quantum theory was a true reflection of reality. In 1982, the results came in – and the world has never been the same since!
At extremely low temperatures, quantum rules mean that atoms can come together and behave as if they are one giant super-atom.
The most precise clocks we have are atomic clocks which are powered by quantum mechanics. Besides keeping time, they can also let your smartphone know where you are.
The rules of the quantum world mean that we can process information much faster than is possible using the computers we use now. This column from Quanta Magazine delves into the fundamental physics behind quantum computing.
People have been hiding information in messages for millennia, but the quantum world provides a whole new way to do it.
Unless it is carefully isolated, a quantum system will “leak” information into its surroundings. This can destroy delicate states such as superposition and entanglement.
Albert Einstein decided quantum theory couldn’t be right because its reliance on probability means everything is a result of chance. “God doesn’t play dice with the world,” he said.
When two quantum objects interact, the information they contain becomes shared. This can result in a kind of link between them, where an action performed on one will affect the outcome of an action performed on the other. This “entanglement” applies even if the two particles are half a universe apart.
As the world makes more advances in quantum science and technologies, it is time to think about how it will impact lives and how society should respond. This mini-documentary by the Quantum Daily is a good starting point to think about these ethical issues.
Ideas at the heart of quantum theory, to do with randomness and the character of the molecules that make up the physical matter of our brains, lead some researchers to suggest humans can’t have free will.
These elementary particles hold together the quarks that lie at the heart of matter.
Our best theory of gravity no longer belongs to Isaac Newton. It’s Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. There’s just one problem: it is incompatible with quantum theory. The effort to tie the two together provides the greatest challenge to physics in the 21st century.
In 1975, Stephen Hawking showed that the principles of quantum mechanics would mean that a black hole emits a slow stream of particles and would eventually evaporate.
One school of thought says that the strangeness of quantum theory can be put down to a lack of information; if we could find the “hidden variables” the mysteries would all go away.
Many researchers working in quantum theory believe that information is the most fundamental building block of reality.
Some of the strangest characteristics of quantum theory can be demonstrated by firing a photon into an interferometer
This is a narrow constriction in a ring of superconductor. Current can only move around the ring because of quantum laws; the apparatus provides a neat way to investigate the properties of quantum mechanics and is a technology to build qubits for quantum computers.
These are particles that carry a quantum property called strangeness. Some fundamental particles have the property known as charm!
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a way to create secure cryptographic keys, allowing for more secure communication.
At CERN in Geneva, Switzerland, this machine is smashing apart particles in order to discover their constituent parts and the quantum laws that govern their behaviour.
Some researchers think the best way to explain the strange characteristics of the quantum world is to allow that each quantum event creates a new universe.
Quantum physics is the study of nature at the very small. Mathematics is one language used to formalise or describe quantum phenomena.
Our most successful theories of cosmology suggest that our universe is one of many universes that bubble off from one another. It’s not clear whether it will ever be possible to detect these other universes.
When two quantum particles are entangled, it can also be said they are “nonlocal”: their physical proximity does not affect the way their quantum states are linked.
Niels Bohr, one of the founding fathers of quantum physics, said there is no such thing as objective reality. All we can talk about, he said, is the results of measurements we make.
This is one of the universal constants of nature, and relates the energy of a single quantum of radiation to its frequency. It is central to quantum theory and appears in many important formulae, including the Schrödinger Equation.
Quantum mechanics is a probabilistic theory: it does not give definite answers, but only the probability that an experiment will come up with a particular answer. This was the source of Einstein’s objection that God “does not play dice” with the universe.
A new and growing field that explores whether many biological processes depend on uniquely quantum processes to work. Under particular scrutiny at the moment are photosynthesis, smell and the navigation of migratory birds.
Quantum states, which represent the state of affairs of a quantum system, change by a different set of rules than classical states.
One quantum bit of information is known as a qubit (pronounced Q-bit). The ability of quantum particles to exist in many different states at once means a single quantum object can represent multiple qubits at once, opening up the possibility of extremely fast information processing.
Unpredictability lies at the heart of quantum mechanics. It bothered Einstein, but it also bothers the Dalai Lama.
Since the predictions of quantum theory have been right in every experiment ever done, many researchers think it is the best guide we have to the nature of reality. Unfortunately, that still leaves room for plenty of ideas about what reality really is!
This is the central equation of quantum theory, and describes how any quantum system will behave, and how its observable qualities are likely to manifest in an experiment.
A hypothetical experiment in which a cat kept in a closed box can be alive and dead at the same time – as long as nobody lifts the lid to take a look.
Researchers are harnessing the intricacies of quantum mechanics to develop powerful quantum sensors. These sensors could open up a wide range of applications.
The feature of a quantum system whereby it exists in several separate quantum states at the same time.
Quantum tricks allow a particle to be transported from one location to another without passing through the intervening space – or that’s how it appears. The reality is that the process is more like faxing, where the information held by one particle is written onto a distant particle.
The arrow of time is “irreversible”—time goes forward. On microscopic quantum scales, this seems less certain. A recent experiment shows that the forward pointing of the arrow of time remains a fundamental rule for quantum measurements.
Is time travel really possible? This article looks at what relativity and quantum mechanics has to say.
This happens when quantum objects “borrow” energy in order to bypass an obstacle such as a gap in an electrical circuit. It is possible thanks to the uncertainty principle, and enables quantum particles to do things other particles can’t.
One of the most famous ideas in science, this declares that it is impossible to know all the physical attributes of a quantum particle or system simultaneously.
To many researchers, the universe behaves like a gigantic quantum computer that is busy processing all the information it contains.
Quantum theory’s uncertainty principle says that since not even empty space can have zero energy, the universe is fizzing with particle-antiparticle pairs that pop in and out of existence. These “virtual” particles are the source of Hawking radiation.
It is possible to describe an atom, an electron, or a photon as either a wave or a particle. In reality, they are both: a wave and a particle.
The mathematics of quantum theory associates each quantum object with a wavefunction that appears in the Schrödinger equation and gives the probability of finding it in any given state.
In 1923 Arthur Compton shone X-rays onto a block of graphite and found that they bounced off with their energy reduced exactly as would be expected if they were composed of particles colliding with electrons in the graphite. This was the first indication of radiation’s particle-like nature.
In 1801, Thomas Young proved light was a wave, and overthrew Newton’s idea that light was a “corpuscle”.
Even at absolute zero, the lowest temperature possible, nothing has zero energy. In these conditions, particles and fields are in their lowest energy state, with an energy proportional to Planck’s constant.